From 4235f6b192986e5f70282f948fac8cd394ccb53e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Steinberger <steipete@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2026 11:50:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] test: tighten commitment extraction assertions

---
 src/commitments/extraction.test.ts | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/commitments/extraction.test.ts b/src/commitments/extraction.test.ts
index 9ff2e9a7753..f475569fe83 100644
--- a/src/commitments/extraction.test.ts
+++ b/src/commitments/extraction.test.ts
@@ -85,10 +85,8 @@ describe("commitment extraction", () => {
     );
 
     expect(parsed.candidates).toHaveLength(1);
-    expect(parsed.candidates[0]).toMatchObject({
-      kind: "event_check_in",
-      suggestedText: "How did the interview go?",
-    });
+    expect(parsed.candidates[0]?.kind).toBe("event_check_in");
+    expect(parsed.candidates[0]?.suggestedText).toBe("How did the interview go?");
   });
 
   it("omits routing scope identifiers from extractor prompts", () => {
@@ -192,10 +190,8 @@ describe("commitment extraction", () => {
     expect(created).toHaveLength(1);
     expect(deduped).toHaveLength(0);
     expect(store.commitments).toHaveLength(1);
-    expect(store.commitments[0]).toMatchObject({
-      reason: "Updated reason",
-      confidence: 0.97,
-      status: "pending",
-    });
+    expect(store.commitments[0]?.reason).toBe("Updated reason");
+    expect(store.commitments[0]?.confidence).toBe(0.97);
+    expect(store.commitments[0]?.status).toBe("pending");
   });
 });