docs: require issue summaries in agent replies

This commit is contained in:
Peter Steinberger
2026-05-31 14:07:08 +01:00
parent 3ca4e5f616
commit 17c8602a9c

View File

@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ Skills own workflows; root owns hard policy and routing.
- No unsolicited PR labels/retitles/rebases/fixups/landing. Comments/reviews ok only for reviewable findings, pre-merge proof, or close/duplicate reason after explicit close/sweep/landing request.
- Maintainer decision closes the cluster: if deciding reported behavior/proposed fix is not planned, comment+close all directly associated open issues/PRs unless explicitly told to keep one open. Associated means linked PRs/issues, duplicates, companion workaround PRs, and the canonical issue for the rejected behavior.
- Do not leave associated issues open for hypothetical future repros. Close with rationale; ask for a new issue or reopen only if concrete new evidence appears. Close comment states: decision, why, supported alternative, and what evidence would change the decision.
- Issue/PR numbers need a short summary every time; assume the reader has not opened or read them.
- PR review answer: bug/behavior, URL(s), affected surface, provenance for regressions when traceable, best-fix judgment, evidence from code/tests/CI/current or shipped behavior.
- PR reviewable findings: post them on the PR, not chat-only, so author sees actionable feedback.
- Issue/PR final answer: last line is the full GitHub URL.