Rebased and landed contributor work from @chengzhichao-xydt for the
Telegram multi-account DM regression in #32351.
Co-authored-by: Zhichao Cheng <cheng.zhichao@xydigit.com>
* fix(ollama): support thinking field fallback in native stream
* fix(models): honor explicit lower token limits in merge mode
* fix(ollama): prefer streamed content over fallback thinking
* changelog: note Ollama local model fixes
* fix(telegram): use group allowlist for native command auth in groups
Native slash commands (/status, /model, etc.) in Telegram supergroups
and forum topics reject authorized senders with "not authorized" even
when the sender is in groupAllowFrom.
The bug is in resolveTelegramCommandAuth — the final commandAuthorized
check only passes DM allowFrom as an authorizer, so senders who are
authorized via groupAllowFrom get rejected. Regular messages don't have
this problem because they go through evaluateTelegramGroupPolicyAccess
which correctly uses effectiveGroupAllow.
Add effectiveGroupAllow as a second authorizer when the message comes
from a group. resolveCommandAuthorizedFromAuthorizers uses .some(), so
either DM or group allowlist matching is sufficient.
Fixes#28216Fixes#29135Fixes#30234
* fix(test): resolve TS2769 type errors in group-auth test
Remove explicit tuple type annotations on mock.calls.filter() callbacks
that conflicted with vitest's mock call types.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(telegram): cover topic auth rejection routing
* changelog: note telegram native group command auth fix
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Koc <vincentkoc@ieee.org>
* fix(telegram): support negative IDs in groupAllowFrom for group/channel whitelist (#36753)
When configuring Telegram group restrictions with groupAllowFrom,
negative group/channel IDs (e.g., -1001234567890) are rejected with
'authorization requires numeric Telegram sender IDs only' error,
even though the field name suggests it should accept group IDs.
Root cause:
- normalizeAllowFrom() uses regex /^\d+$/ to validate IDs
- Telegram group/channel IDs are negative integers
- Regex only matches positive integers, rejecting all group IDs
Impact:
- Users cannot whitelist specific groups using groupAllowFrom
- Workaround requires groupPolicy: "open" (security risk)
- Field name is misleading (suggests group IDs, but only accepts user IDs)
Fix:
- Change regex from /^\d+$/ to /^-?\d+$/ (support optional minus sign)
- Apply to both invalidEntries filter and ids filter
- Add comment explaining negative ID support for groups/channels
Testing:
- Positive user IDs (745123456) → ✅ still work
- Negative group IDs (-1001234567890) → ✅ now accepted
- Invalid entries (@username) → ⚠️ still warned
Fixes#36753
* test(telegram): add signed ID runtime regression
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Qiu <qiuyuemartin@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Koc <vincentkoc@ieee.org>
