mirror of
https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw.git
synced 2026-03-12 07:20:45 +00:00
254 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
254 lines
7.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: review-pr
|
|
description: Review-only GitHub pull request analysis with the gh CLI. Use when asked to review a PR, provide structured feedback, or assess readiness to land. Do not merge, push, or make code changes you intend to keep.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Review PR
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
Perform a thorough review-only PR assessment and return a structured recommendation on readiness for /prepare-pr.
|
|
|
|
## Inputs
|
|
|
|
- Ask for PR number or URL.
|
|
- If missing, always ask. Never auto-detect from conversation.
|
|
- If ambiguous, ask.
|
|
|
|
## Safety
|
|
|
|
- Never push to `main` or `origin/main`, not during review, not ever.
|
|
- Do not run `git push` at all during review. Treat review as read only.
|
|
- Do not stop or kill the gateway. Do not run gateway stop commands. Do not kill processes on port 18792.
|
|
|
|
## Execution Rule
|
|
|
|
- Execute the workflow. Do not stop after printing the TODO checklist.
|
|
- If delegating, require the delegate to run commands and capture outputs, not a plan.
|
|
|
|
## Known Failure Modes
|
|
|
|
- If you see "fatal: not a git repository", you are in the wrong directory. Move to the repository root and retry.
|
|
- Do not stop after printing the checklist. That is not completion.
|
|
|
|
## Writing Style for Output
|
|
|
|
- Write casual and direct.
|
|
- Avoid em dashes and en dashes. Use commas or separate sentences.
|
|
|
|
## Completion Criteria
|
|
|
|
- Run the commands in the worktree and inspect the PR directly.
|
|
- Produce the structured review sections A through J.
|
|
- Save the full review to `.local/review.md` inside the worktree.
|
|
- Save PR metadata handoff to `.local/pr-meta.env` inside the worktree.
|
|
|
|
## First: Create a TODO Checklist
|
|
|
|
Create a checklist of all review steps, print it, then continue and execute the commands.
|
|
|
|
## Setup: Use a Worktree
|
|
|
|
Use an isolated worktree for all review work.
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
repo_root=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
|
|
cd "$repo_root"
|
|
gh auth status
|
|
|
|
WORKTREE_DIR=".worktrees/pr-<PR>"
|
|
git fetch origin main
|
|
|
|
# Reuse existing worktree if it exists, otherwise create new
|
|
if [ -d "$WORKTREE_DIR" ]; then
|
|
git worktree list
|
|
cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
|
|
git fetch origin main
|
|
git checkout -B temp/pr-<PR> origin/main
|
|
else
|
|
git worktree add "$WORKTREE_DIR" -b temp/pr-<PR> origin/main
|
|
cd "$WORKTREE_DIR"
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
# Create local scratch space that persists across /review-pr to /prepare-pr to /merge-pr
|
|
mkdir -p .local
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Run all commands inside the worktree directory.
|
|
Start on `origin/main` so you can check for existing implementations before looking at PR code.
|
|
|
|
## Steps
|
|
|
|
1. Identify PR meta and context
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pr_meta_json=$(gh pr view <PR> --json number,title,state,isDraft,author,baseRefName,headRefName,headRefOid,headRepository,url,body,labels,assignees,reviewRequests,files,additions,deletions,statusCheckRollup)
|
|
printf '%s\n' "$pr_meta_json" | jq '{number,title,url,state,isDraft,author:.author.login,base:.baseRefName,head:.headRefName,headSha:.headRefOid,headRepo:.headRepository.nameWithOwner,additions,deletions,files:(.files|length),body}'
|
|
|
|
cat > .local/pr-meta.env <<EOF
|
|
PR_NUMBER=$(printf '%s\n' "$pr_meta_json" | jq -r .number)
|
|
PR_URL=$(printf '%s\n' "$pr_meta_json" | jq -r .url)
|
|
PR_AUTHOR=$(printf '%s\n' "$pr_meta_json" | jq -r .author.login)
|
|
PR_BASE=$(printf '%s\n' "$pr_meta_json" | jq -r .baseRefName)
|
|
PR_HEAD=$(printf '%s\n' "$pr_meta_json" | jq -r .headRefName)
|
|
PR_HEAD_SHA=$(printf '%s\n' "$pr_meta_json" | jq -r .headRefOid)
|
|
PR_HEAD_REPO=$(printf '%s\n' "$pr_meta_json" | jq -r .headRepository.nameWithOwner)
|
|
EOF
|
|
|
|
ls -la .local/pr-meta.env
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2. Check if this already exists in main before looking at the PR branch
|
|
|
|
- Identify the core feature or fix from the PR title and description.
|
|
- Search for existing implementations using keywords from the PR title, changed file paths, and function or component names from the diff.
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
# Use keywords from the PR title and changed files
|
|
rg -n "<keyword_from_pr_title>" -S src packages apps ui || true
|
|
rg -n "<function_or_component_name>" -S src packages apps ui || true
|
|
|
|
git log --oneline --all --grep="<keyword_from_pr_title>" | head -20
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If it already exists, call it out as a BLOCKER or at least IMPORTANT.
|
|
|
|
3. Claim the PR
|
|
|
|
Assign yourself so others know someone is reviewing. Skip if the PR looks like spam or is a draft you plan to recommend closing.
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
gh_user=$(gh api user --jq .login)
|
|
gh pr edit <PR> --add-assignee "$gh_user" || echo "Could not assign reviewer, continuing"
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
4. Read the PR description carefully
|
|
|
|
Use the body from step 1. Summarize goal, scope, and missing context.
|
|
|
|
5. Read the diff thoroughly
|
|
|
|
Minimum:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
gh pr diff <PR>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If you need full code context locally, fetch the PR head to a local ref and diff it. Do not create a merge commit.
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
git fetch origin pull/<PR>/head:pr-<PR> --force
|
|
mb=$(git merge-base origin/main pr-<PR>)
|
|
|
|
# Show only this PR patch relative to merge-base, not total branch drift
|
|
git diff --stat "$mb"..pr-<PR>
|
|
git diff "$mb"..pr-<PR>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If you want to browse the PR version of files directly, temporarily check out `pr-<PR>` in the worktree. Do not commit or push. Return to `temp/pr-<PR>` and reset to `origin/main` afterward.
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
# Use only if needed
|
|
# git checkout pr-<PR>
|
|
# git branch --show-current
|
|
# ...inspect files...
|
|
|
|
git checkout temp/pr-<PR>
|
|
git checkout -B temp/pr-<PR> origin/main
|
|
git branch --show-current
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
6. Validate the change is needed and valuable
|
|
|
|
Be honest. Call out low value AI slop.
|
|
|
|
7. Evaluate implementation quality
|
|
|
|
Review correctness, design, performance, and ergonomics.
|
|
|
|
8. Perform a security review
|
|
|
|
Assume OpenClaw subagents run with full disk access, including git, gh, and shell. Check auth, input validation, secrets, dependencies, tool safety, and privacy.
|
|
|
|
9. Review tests and verification
|
|
|
|
Identify what exists, what is missing, and what would be a minimal regression test.
|
|
|
|
If you run local tests in the worktree, bootstrap dependencies first:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
if [ ! -x node_modules/.bin/vitest ]; then
|
|
pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
|
|
fi
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
10. Check docs
|
|
|
|
Check if the PR touches code with related documentation such as README, docs, inline API docs, or config examples.
|
|
|
|
- If docs exist for the changed area and the PR does not update them, flag as IMPORTANT.
|
|
- If the PR adds a new feature or config option with no docs, flag as IMPORTANT.
|
|
- If the change is purely internal with no user-facing impact, skip this.
|
|
|
|
11. Check changelog
|
|
|
|
Check if `CHANGELOG.md` exists and whether the PR warrants an entry.
|
|
|
|
- If the project has a changelog and the PR is user-facing, flag missing entry as IMPORTANT.
|
|
- Leave the change for /prepare-pr, only flag it here.
|
|
|
|
12. Answer the key question
|
|
|
|
Decide if /prepare-pr can fix issues or the contributor must update the PR.
|
|
|
|
13. Save findings to the worktree
|
|
|
|
Write the full structured review sections A through J to `.local/review.md`.
|
|
Create or overwrite the file and verify it exists and is non-empty.
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
ls -la .local/review.md
|
|
wc -l .local/review.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
14. Output the structured review
|
|
|
|
Produce a review that matches what you saved to `.local/review.md`.
|
|
|
|
A) TL;DR recommendation
|
|
|
|
- One of: READY FOR /prepare-pr | NEEDS WORK | NEEDS DISCUSSION | NOT USEFUL (CLOSE)
|
|
- 1 to 3 sentences.
|
|
|
|
B) What changed
|
|
|
|
C) What is good
|
|
|
|
D) Security findings
|
|
|
|
E) Concerns or questions (actionable)
|
|
|
|
- Numbered list.
|
|
- Mark each item as BLOCKER, IMPORTANT, or NIT.
|
|
- For each, point to file or area and propose a concrete fix.
|
|
|
|
F) Tests
|
|
|
|
G) Docs status
|
|
|
|
- State if related docs are up to date, missing, or not applicable.
|
|
|
|
H) Changelog
|
|
|
|
- State if `CHANGELOG.md` needs an entry and which category.
|
|
|
|
I) Follow ups (optional)
|
|
|
|
J) Suggested PR comment (optional)
|
|
|
|
## Guardrails
|
|
|
|
- Worktree only.
|
|
- Do not delete the worktree after review.
|
|
- Review only, do not merge, do not push.
|